<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis: How useful is Blitzweekend or StartupWeekends for Tech Communities? Answer: a lot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/</link>
	<description>Technology and Innovation news in Montreal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassenzone &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; 100.000 Besucher auf Kassenzone.de dank Techcrunch Link&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-355112</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassenzone &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; 100.000 Besucher auf Kassenzone.de dank Techcrunch Link&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-355112</guid>
		<description>[...] Startup Weekend Artikel wird übrigens hier und hier kontrovers weiter diskutiert. Es gibt doch einige Startup Weekend Verfechter in den USA.    Tags [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Startup Weekend Artikel wird übrigens hier und hier kontrovers weiter diskutiert. Es gibt doch einige Startup Weekend Verfechter in den USA.    Tags [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100.000 Besucher auf Kassenzone.de dank Techcrunch Link&#8230; &#171; Kassenzone - Commerce, Mobile, Technologie</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-153436</link>
		<dc:creator>100.000 Besucher auf Kassenzone.de dank Techcrunch Link&#8230; &#171; Kassenzone - Commerce, Mobile, Technologie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-153436</guid>
		<description>[...] Startup Weekend Artikel wird übrigens hier und hier kontrovers weiter diskutiert. Es gibt doch einige Startup Weekend Verfechter in den USA.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Startup Weekend Artikel wird übrigens hier und hier kontrovers weiter diskutiert. Es gibt doch einige Startup Weekend Verfechter in den USA.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology news - Techvibes Blog</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-153315</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology news - Techvibes Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-153315</guid>
		<description>[...] Tech Watch leapt in to point out that Blitzweekend, one of the startup pressure-cooker events held in Montreal, had in fact not only succeeded but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tech Watch leapt in to point out that Blitzweekend, one of the startup pressure-cooker events held in Montreal, had in fact not only succeeded but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Arsenault</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-457294</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Arsenault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-457294</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;A different point of view RT @mtw TechCrunch don’t know what they are talking about http://tinyurl.com/crjox9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">A different point of view RT @mtw TechCrunch don’t know what they are talking about <a href="http://tinyurl.com/crjox9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/crjox9</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtltech</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-457295</link>
		<dc:creator>mtltech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-457295</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;[mtw] TechCrunch don’t know what they are talking about: There’s an “analysis” on TechCru.. http://tinyurl.com/crjox9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">[mtw] TechCrunch don’t know what they are talking about: There’s an “analysis” on TechCru.. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/crjox9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/crjox9</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montreal Tech Watch</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-457296</link>
		<dc:creator>Montreal Tech Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-457296</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;TechCrunch don’t know what they are talking about http://tinyurl.com/crjox9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">TechCrunch don’t know what they are talking about <a href="http://tinyurl.com/crjox9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/crjox9</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Canuel</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-152828</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Canuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-152828</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m biased as I took part in the BlitzWeekend last year as a coordinator and I have to admit that in this case, it was a success.

Now you need to define what is success to your eyes.

In the case of the BlitzWeekend, we wanted to bring 2 groups together: the IT crowd and the tie and suit crowd. I think it worked and both groups found out that there is life beyond their own walls.

I spoke to a few participants many months later and some of them were still working on their idea.

So what if the success rate is only 10%? I find it damn good considering that startup life *IS* hard by definition and that most fail. Besides, isn&#039;t &quot;failure is ok&quot; part of what Silicon Valley embrases after all?

With the entry barriers being at an all time low, this is what we need: a place to ignite fires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://www.DenisCanuel.com'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/97d96cf3ff78caf58fd6d29cc1af2d76?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>I&#8217;m biased as I took part in the BlitzWeekend last year as a coordinator and I have to admit that in this case, it was a success.</p>
<p>Now you need to define what is success to your eyes.</p>
<p>In the case of the BlitzWeekend, we wanted to bring 2 groups together: the IT crowd and the tie and suit crowd. I think it worked and both groups found out that there is life beyond their own walls.</p>
<p>I spoke to a few participants many months later and some of them were still working on their idea.</p>
<p>So what if the success rate is only 10%? I find it damn good considering that startup life *IS* hard by definition and that most fail. Besides, isn&#8217;t &#8220;failure is ok&#8221; part of what Silicon Valley embrases after all?</p>
<p>With the entry barriers being at an all time low, this is what we need: a place to ignite fires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume Theoret</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-152732</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume Theoret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-152732</guid>
		<description>I generally try to avoid techcrunch because a lot of it is linkbait. If something genuinely interesting comes along it usually ends up on a social news site I follow.

In this case, I agree that the metric for success was unfair. Their website clearly states that it&#039;s primarily a community building event, one where you can start projects and start companies. To me this means that it&#039;s an event to keep up people&#039;s enthusiasm and if the actual project fails, so be it, start another. It&#039;s also important for the seriousness of the event to add the start companies bit because obviously (10%) of the time, you can build a business out of it. This helps the image a lot and keeps people focused.

Overall, I would put this in the linkbait bucket. It&#039;s off-target and if they really wanted to write a good article they would&#039;ve done some legwork themselves and added something to the &quot;analysis&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://smokinn.com'><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6baebf88c88c0383b691aa8aa973914b?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>I generally try to avoid techcrunch because a lot of it is linkbait. If something genuinely interesting comes along it usually ends up on a social news site I follow.</p>
<p>In this case, I agree that the metric for success was unfair. Their website clearly states that it&#8217;s primarily a community building event, one where you can start projects and start companies. To me this means that it&#8217;s an event to keep up people&#8217;s enthusiasm and if the actual project fails, so be it, start another. It&#8217;s also important for the seriousness of the event to add the start companies bit because obviously (10%) of the time, you can build a business out of it. This helps the image a lot and keeps people focused.</p>
<p>Overall, I would put this in the linkbait bucket. It&#8217;s off-target and if they really wanted to write a good article they would&#8217;ve done some legwork themselves and added something to the &#8220;analysis&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-152723</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-152723</guid>
		<description>Robin,

You mention that you are involved in organizing Startup Weekend Belgium and other initiatives across Europe so you obviously can rally behind the intent of Startup Weekend. I assume that the message you posted was simply mis-read.

Perhaps you should have titled your article “How Far Do Projects Launched At Startup Weekends Travel? (It Doesn’t Matter)” If that was your point. Also adding the word “analysis” at the beginning of your title kind of suggests it is your analysis, and “not very far” suggests that your opinion is the “projects” do not lead anywhere.

Again you obviously wouldn’t be putting in the effort to get your community organized around such initiatives if you thought they did not lead anywhere “far” =). We are excited to see if Belgium and other cities you are involved in can help us bring the 10% success number up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f35cd2a4ec97c22b6bf79cca2f439fff?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>Robin,</p>
<p>You mention that you are involved in organizing Startup Weekend Belgium and other initiatives across Europe so you obviously can rally behind the intent of Startup Weekend. I assume that the message you posted was simply mis-read.</p>
<p>Perhaps you should have titled your article “How Far Do Projects Launched At Startup Weekends Travel? (It Doesn’t Matter)” If that was your point. Also adding the word “analysis” at the beginning of your title kind of suggests it is your analysis, and “not very far” suggests that your opinion is the “projects” do not lead anywhere.</p>
<p>Again you obviously wouldn’t be putting in the effort to get your community organized around such initiatives if you thought they did not lead anywhere “far” =). We are excited to see if Belgium and other cities you are involved in can help us bring the 10% success number up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heri</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2009/04/29/techcrunch-dont-know-what-they-are-talking-about/#comment-152690</link>
		<dc:creator>Heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/?p=1549#comment-152690</guid>
		<description>Actually, I haven&#039;t seen the line on &quot;Start projects, start companies&quot;

which is a bit wrong imho, and not the ideal way to present it. 

Blitzweekend was presented differently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://heri.madmedia.ca'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/76d226166e7f70ccb556f5bb043512aa?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>Actually, I haven&#8217;t seen the line on &#8220;Start projects, start companies&#8221;</p>
<p>which is a bit wrong imho, and not the ideal way to present it. </p>
<p>Blitzweekend was presented differently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.186 seconds -->

