<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mediascrape&#8217;s credibility gets a hit; naive move at TC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/</link>
	<description>Technology and Innovation news in Montreal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan Prata</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-914582</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan Prata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-914582</guid>
		<description>Is definitely blogengine superior to wordpress in some way? Ought to be as it&#039;s increasingly popluar as of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://towhatweknow.info/forum/'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/51011d26d62bc04051b2d2c3eb5708f0?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>Is definitely blogengine superior to wordpress in some way? Ought to be as it&#8217;s increasingly popluar as of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun Souhrada</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-913973</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun Souhrada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-913973</guid>
		<description>There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://fattyliverdietplans.com/press.php'><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/a3482e91f5d18278f2b5c07809f028bb?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montreal Gazette</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24907</link>
		<dc:creator>Montreal Gazette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24907</guid>
		<description>[...] bickering among bloggers knows, is an invitation to ridicule.Now Tyler is being poked by some local bloggers as one out of touch with the culture and decorum of Internet startups: he doesn&#039;t attend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bickering among bloggers knows, is an invitation to ridicule.Now Tyler is being poked by some local bloggers as one out of touch with the culture and decorum of Internet startups: he doesn&#8217;t attend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heri</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24685</link>
		<dc:creator>Heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24685</guid>
		<description>lpgauth,

I read the Techcrunch comments, and the commenter who stands out was a guy called &quot;Chris&quot;. But he&#039;s just a troll, and my policy on trolling is to just ignore them. It seems &quot;Chris&quot; has had a bad experience with his Quebec and Canadian experience, and it also seems he prefers now Southern California -- which is ok for me. 

Bill,

I don&#039;t think Michael Arrington writes controversial posts just for the sake of controversy. He is well ahead of most bloggers on some topics, due to his network and his experience, and that&#039;s how people perceive he publishes controversial posts. It&#039;s true though that he is often harsh and is not afraid of writing his opinions. 

I also understand your point about cyber-bullying, the thing is that many don&#039;t understand that a blog is mostly about personal opinions; akin to an oral conversation. People think that since it&#039;s written, it must be &quot;true&quot; and about &quot;facts&quot;. Take blogs with a grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://heri.madmedia.ca'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/76d226166e7f70ccb556f5bb043512aa?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>lpgauth,</p>
<p>I read the Techcrunch comments, and the commenter who stands out was a guy called &#8220;Chris&#8221;. But he&#8217;s just a troll, and my policy on trolling is to just ignore them. It seems &#8220;Chris&#8221; has had a bad experience with his Quebec and Canadian experience, and it also seems he prefers now Southern California &#8212; which is ok for me. </p>
<p>Bill,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Michael Arrington writes controversial posts just for the sake of controversy. He is well ahead of most bloggers on some topics, due to his network and his experience, and that&#8217;s how people perceive he publishes controversial posts. It&#8217;s true though that he is often harsh and is not afraid of writing his opinions. </p>
<p>I also understand your point about cyber-bullying, the thing is that many don&#8217;t understand that a blog is mostly about personal opinions; akin to an oral conversation. People think that since it&#8217;s written, it must be &#8220;true&#8221; and about &#8220;facts&#8221;. Take blogs with a grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24675</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24675</guid>
		<description>The same blogger got similar letters from several companies- like YouTube for example. He makes controversial posts, to attract more links to his site and more audience. As simple as that. In terms of Mediascrape it looks like Michael Arrington may have expressed his personal opinion, which is “free speech”. There is also other type of blogging – cyber bulling, which intentionally harmed people (and companies), and resulted in several deaths of teenagers recently. Bloggers who spread lies and use Internet to bully either individuals or companies need to be imprisoned and definitely sued for damages. There are cases where people received over $10 million for cyber-bulling cases. In fact, anyone who falsely accused other person without any real evidence should pay for damages. Cyber-bulling needs to be reported immediately to the local police. http://www.overcomebullying.org/cyber-bullying.html To refute your post- not every threat of a lawsuit to a blogger is frivolous. By the way, third party stats including Alexa, Quantcast are misleading (often completely incorrect).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/89be83e21903fdac5a779c1878f21162?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>The same blogger got similar letters from several companies- like YouTube for example. He makes controversial posts, to attract more links to his site and more audience. As simple as that. In terms of Mediascrape it looks like Michael Arrington may have expressed his personal opinion, which is “free speech”. There is also other type of blogging – cyber bulling, which intentionally harmed people (and companies), and resulted in several deaths of teenagers recently. Bloggers who spread lies and use Internet to bully either individuals or companies need to be imprisoned and definitely sued for damages. There are cases where people received over $10 million for cyber-bulling cases. In fact, anyone who falsely accused other person without any real evidence should pay for damages. Cyber-bulling needs to be reported immediately to the local police. <a href="http://www.overcomebullying.org/cyber-bullying.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.overcomebullying.org/cyber-bullying.html</a> To refute your post- not every threat of a lawsuit to a blogger is frivolous. By the way, third party stats including Alexa, Quantcast are misleading (often completely incorrect).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lpgauth</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24674</link>
		<dc:creator>lpgauth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24674</guid>
		<description>Just saw your post on twitter. 

Why is their so much hate towards Quebec... Techcrunch should moderate comments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6cee04ebecc43cab78790d7021dfb8d4?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>Just saw your post on twitter. </p>
<p>Why is their so much hate towards Quebec&#8230; Techcrunch should moderate comments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StartupNorth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pride and Prejudice</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24649</link>
		<dc:creator>StartupNorth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pride and Prejudice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2008/05/26/mediascrapes-credibility-gets-a-hit-naive-move-at-tc/#comment-24649</guid>
		<description>[...] kept flipping through my news feeds, I came across an embarrassing update about MediaScrape, which Heri and Mathew Ingram both covered well. When we first posted about MediaScrape, Tyler Cavell, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kept flipping through my news feeds, I came across an embarrassing update about MediaScrape, which Heri and Mathew Ingram both covered well. When we first posted about MediaScrape, Tyler Cavell, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.176 seconds -->

