<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuebecTorrent&#8217;s lawsuit might get all Canadian p2p trackers illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/</link>
	<description>Technology and Innovation news in Montreal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kambulow</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-22191</link>
		<dc:creator>kambulow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-22191</guid>
		<description>What about suing the really big crooks like Bell Sympatico firstly?

What started as a simple phone call by me in January 2007 to Bell tech help line to determine why my internet services were so slow and sluggish. became a major farce on the part of Bell Sympatico. I was lied for months as to the real reasons Bell they rather had offered their poor internet services to me and to many others in my city for years now too.. and then Bell lied to me some more, breached their contractual obligations many times too, allowed me even to be slandered, absued on the Bell customer forums now too.. and why? so clearly greedy Bell can continue stay in business to make more money.. and who really cares now about the customer’s good welfare in reaity? Not Bell, not the CRTC, not the federal government, not our Prime Minister Stephen Harper, not the the fderal Minister of Consumer Affairs, Jim Prentice.. not any provincial consumer affairs Minister, but only the citizems, the news media, and the NDP party care about the citizens good welfare really it seems. Not acceptable for sure too!

I too would now rightfully like to see the provisions that made DPI (deep packet inspection) by ISPs to be made illegal not just by the CRTC but also by the federal government now too, including many of the bad acts of Bell, the Big Brother’s false invasion of our home, personal privacy. Since we can readily know that the reasons given for the internet downloading inspections, capping are unjustifiable, what are the actual reasons now for these online now inspections too? 

http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/'><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c03bd315f1b7e074a63040c91c7a0a32?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>What about suing the really big crooks like Bell Sympatico firstly?</p>
<p>What started as a simple phone call by me in January 2007 to Bell tech help line to determine why my internet services were so slow and sluggish. became a major farce on the part of Bell Sympatico. I was lied for months as to the real reasons Bell they rather had offered their poor internet services to me and to many others in my city for years now too.. and then Bell lied to me some more, breached their contractual obligations many times too, allowed me even to be slandered, absued on the Bell customer forums now too.. and why? so clearly greedy Bell can continue stay in business to make more money.. and who really cares now about the customer’s good welfare in reaity? Not Bell, not the CRTC, not the federal government, not our Prime Minister Stephen Harper, not the the fderal Minister of Consumer Affairs, Jim Prentice.. not any provincial consumer affairs Minister, but only the citizems, the news media, and the NDP party care about the citizens good welfare really it seems. Not acceptable for sure too!</p>
<p>I too would now rightfully like to see the provisions that made DPI (deep packet inspection) by ISPs to be made illegal not just by the CRTC but also by the federal government now too, including many of the bad acts of Bell, the Big Brother’s false invasion of our home, personal privacy. Since we can readily know that the reasons given for the internet downloading inspections, capping are unjustifiable, what are the actual reasons now for these online now inspections too? </p>
<p><a href="http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heri</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-17210</link>
		<dc:creator>Heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-17210</guid>
		<description>john baker, english is only one of Canada&#039; s official language

i assume everyone reading montrealtechwatch is bilingual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://heri.madmedia.ca'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/76d226166e7f70ccb556f5bb043512aa?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>john baker, english is only one of Canada&#8217; s official language</p>
<p>i assume everyone reading montrealtechwatch is bilingual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baker</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-17175</link>
		<dc:creator>John Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-17175</guid>
		<description>English is still Canada&#039;s official lanquage is it not?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d80ac38b5f6d3f3c1ec2cc1dd1ed8bf9?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>English is still Canada&#8217;s official lanquage is it not?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oniquet</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-7107</link>
		<dc:creator>oniquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-7107</guid>
		<description>Heri, le site est plus &quot;généraliste&quot;... ça n&#039;empêche pas que c&#039;est un sujet qui ne devrait pas intéresser que les gens qui suivent les nouvelles technologiques.

Nous n&#039;avons pas encore la masse critique pour que chaque section soit bien garnie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://www.centpapiers.com/'><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/8f3cbecf8f78ae9f55020884d8e8c3a6?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>Heri, le site est plus &#8220;généraliste&#8221;&#8230; ça n&#8217;empêche pas que c&#8217;est un sujet qui ne devrait pas intéresser que les gens qui suivent les nouvelles technologiques.</p>
<p>Nous n&#8217;avons pas encore la masse critique pour que chaque section soit bien garnie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heri</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-7000</link>
		<dc:creator>Heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-7000</guid>
		<description>olivier, le probleme sur cent-papiers est que la section technologies (http://www.centpapiers.com/+-technologie-+) a un nouveau article/billet tous les mois et c&#039;est pas ca qui va inciter les gens à le lire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://heri.madmedia.ca'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/76d226166e7f70ccb556f5bb043512aa?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>olivier, le probleme sur cent-papiers est que la section technologies (<a href="http://www.centpapiers.com/+-technologie-" rel="nofollow">http://www.centpapiers.com/+-technologie-</a>+) a un nouveau article/billet tous les mois et c&#8217;est pas ca qui va inciter les gens à le lire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oniquet</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator>oniquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/11/27/quebectorrents-lawsuit-might-get-all-canadian-p2p-trackers-illegal/#comment-6981</guid>
		<description>Il y a bien notre CentPapiers et son absence de visibilité qui en a parlé brièvement... ;)

Un jour, nous aurons peut-être les moyens d&#039;avoir plus d&#039;impact et d&#039;aborder ces sujets éludés par les médias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://www.centpapiers.com/'><img alt='' src='http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/8f3cbecf8f78ae9f55020884d8e8c3a6?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>Il y a bien notre CentPapiers et son absence de visibilité qui en a parlé brièvement&#8230; ;)</p>
<p>Un jour, nous aurons peut-être les moyens d&#8217;avoir plus d&#8217;impact et d&#8217;aborder ces sujets éludés par les médias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.173 seconds -->

