<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information wants to be free &#8212; or why problogging is a myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/</link>
	<description>Technology and Innovation news in Montreal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heri</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>Heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>Sylvain Carle: thanks for the link, I saw he published it on 2005. and it proved to be true since

fagstein: if you consider the technicalities, the crowd will always find a way to go around protection schemes. (remember DVD and CD ripping, people will go at great lenghts to get the content in the format they want) 

now there is one way to make indistinguisable technically, which is produce html directly inline (instead of javascripts), which means the website owner has to manage all advertising instead of relying on a third-party ad network. and this brings more problems than it solves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://heri.madmedia.ca'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/76d226166e7f70ccb556f5bb043512aa?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>Sylvain Carle: thanks for the link, I saw he published it on 2005. and it proved to be true since</p>
<p>fagstein: if you consider the technicalities, the crowd will always find a way to go around protection schemes. (remember DVD and CD ripping, people will go at great lenghts to get the content in the format they want) </p>
<p>now there is one way to make indistinguisable technically, which is produce html directly inline (instead of javascripts), which means the website owner has to manage all advertising instead of relying on a third-party ad network. and this brings more problems than it solves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>While I certainly don&#039;t think advertising is the one-stop solution to everything, I disagree that you can&#039;t make adblock-free ads. It&#039;s just a matter of making the ads and content indistinguishable technically. Advertising technology will eventually beat the Turing test, at least well enough that most people won&#039;t bother trying to defeat it unless the ads become very intrusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://blog.fagstein.com/'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/540b171184cecb2c56fe08d963b9f444?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>While I certainly don&#8217;t think advertising is the one-stop solution to everything, I disagree that you can&#8217;t make adblock-free ads. It&#8217;s just a matter of making the ads and content indistinguishable technically. Advertising technology will eventually beat the Turing test, at least well enough that most people won&#8217;t bother trying to defeat it unless the ads become very intrusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvain Carle</title>
		<link>http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvain Carle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealtechwatch.com/2007/09/04/information-wants-to-be-free-or-why-problogging-is-a-myth/#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what Doc Searls calls the &quot;because effect&quot; and I think he is spot on.

&quot;Not that making money with blogs is a Bad Thing. I&#039;m not saying that. I&#039;m saying it&#039;s always easier to think with than because; but that there&#039;s often much more money to be made because of than with.&quot;

http://doc-weblogs.com/2005/10/19#theBecauseEffectContd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:7px; display:block; width:48px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://www.afroginthevalley.com/fr/'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d4e425f808f4af5407c837e0aeb8d232?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fmontrealtechwatch.com%2Fimages%2Fsmall_gravatar.jpg%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></a></span>That&#8217;s what Doc Searls calls the &#8220;because effect&#8221; and I think he is spot on.</p>
<p>&#8220;Not that making money with blogs is a Bad Thing. I&#8217;m not saying that. I&#8217;m saying it&#8217;s always easier to think with than because; but that there&#8217;s often much more money to be made because of than with.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://doc-weblogs.com/2005/10/19#theBecauseEffectContd" rel="nofollow">http://doc-weblogs.com/2005/10/19#theBecauseEffectContd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.165 seconds -->

